New situation 1 · Fictional practice
Spot the changed promise
New fictional notice: A free garden session runs Sunday 2–3 pm; book first and bring gloves. A draft says 'all afternoon, no booking, gloves supplied'. What would you do?
First explain: What would you do next, and why? No personal stories or records are needed.
- Keep the shorter draft
- Check and restore the time, booking rule and bring-your-own-gloves condition
- Change only the spelling
Reasoning to compare
Compare the new draft with this notice, not with the earlier repair example. The draft changes three conditions; restore them and ask about any genuinely missing details.
Words to unpack: Book first means arrange a place before going. A condition is something the notice asks you to do.
Children: learn with a trusted adult. People may decline or stop. No scores, names or answers are collected by AI Down Under. Original educational example, edition 2026-10-09.3; human review and reader testing pending.
Blank pack: aidownunder.org/transfer-cards · Related mission: aidownunder.org/missions/clearer-questions
New situation 2 · Fictional practice
Make everyone feel welcome
A new fictional walking-group brief confirms Tuesday 9 am, but does not confirm toilets or step-free access. What should the invitation do?
First explain: What would you do next, and why? No personal stories or records are needed.
- Promise both to sound welcoming
- Assume access because the route looks flat
- Include confirmed facts and ask the organiser about access and toilets before making those promises
Reasoning to compare
A welcoming tone and verified arrangements are different things. Keep the confirmed time; check facilities and access with the organiser. Do not publish this fictional event as real.
Words to unpack: Accessibility means whether people can take part with their different access needs. Confirmed means checked with a reliable source.
Children: learn with a trusted adult. People may decline or stop. No scores, names or answers are collected by AI Down Under. Original educational example, edition 2026-10-09.3; human review and reader testing pending.
Blank pack: aidownunder.org/transfer-cards · Related mission: aidownunder.org/missions/creative-invitation
New situation 3 · Fictional practice
Explain the puddle puzzle
New supplied learning note: a magnet attracts some materials, such as iron, but not every metal. A draft says 'magnets attract all metals'. Which check helps?
First explain: What would you do next, and why? No personal stories or records are needed.
- Challenge 'all': the supplied note says some, not every
- Agree because it sounds scientific
- Replace the note with the draft
Reasoning to compare
This exercise supplies a new concept. The draft expands 'some' to 'all'. Explain the difference in your own words, then compare with the supplied note; confident wording is not evidence.
Words to unpack: An explanation says how or why something happens. An exception is a case a broad statement does not cover.
Children: learn with a trusted adult. People may decline or stop. No scores, names or answers are collected by AI Down Under. Original educational example, edition 2026-10-09.3; human review and reader testing pending.
Blank pack: aidownunder.org/transfer-cards · Related mission: aidownunder.org/missions/learn-and-explain
New situation 4 · Fictional practice
Pause and call back
New fictional text: 'I changed phones. Transfer money and call this new number to check.' What is an independent next step?
First explain: What would you do next, and why? No personal stories or records are needed.
- Reply with private account details
- Verify with the person or a trusted adult through a contact route you already know, not the number in the message
- Trust it because it uses your first name
Reasoning to compare
The same verification habit applies to a text. Use a previously known contact route or appropriate trusted help, not contact details supplied by the urgent message. Do not enter real numbers here.
Words to unpack: Verify means check. Independent means the check does not rely on information supplied by the request you are checking.
Children: learn with a trusted adult. People may decline or stop. No scores, names or answers are collected by AI Down Under. Original educational example, edition 2026-10-09.3; human review and reader testing pending.
Blank pack: aidownunder.org/transfer-cards · Related mission: aidownunder.org/missions/pause-and-callback
New situation 5 · Fictional practice
Keep private details out
New fictional task: explain a public school excursion notice. A draft asks you to paste a pupil's name and medical record too. What is the safer input?
First explain: What would you do next, and why? No personal stories or records are needed.
- The public notice and a general question; do not paste the pupil record
- The medical record without the pupil's first name
- Everything requested by the tool
Reasoning to compare
The requested private record is unnecessary for explaining a public notice. If a real personal circumstance needs attention, speak through the school's appropriate process rather than uploading it to an unapproved tool.
Words to unpack: An identifier can point to a person or account. Confidential information is material you are not free to share.
Children: learn with a trusted adult. People may decline or stop. No scores, names or answers are collected by AI Down Under. Original educational example, edition 2026-10-09.3; human review and reader testing pending.
Blank pack: aidownunder.org/transfer-cards · Related mission: aidownunder.org/missions/protect-the-input
New situation 6 · Fictional practice
Should AI do this at all?
New fictional options: draft a checked FAQ from a public policy, or let a tool automatically reject job applicants with no human review. What distinction matters?
First explain: What would you do next, and why? No personal stories or records are needed.
- Both are text, so no distinction matters
- The tool should decide when it sounds sure
- A checked FAQ draft and an employment decision have different consequences; keep the appropriate process and responsible person
Reasoning to compare
Text can be part of a high-consequence decision. This exercise supports recognising that difference, not deciding employment law or certifying any hiring system. Use the organisation's appropriate process and expertise.
Words to unpack: Consequences are what could happen because of a choice. Responsible means having a real duty to check and decide—not just clicking approve.
Children: learn with a trusted adult. People may decline or stop. No scores, names or answers are collected by AI Down Under. Original educational example, edition 2026-10-09.3; human review and reader testing pending.
Blank pack: aidownunder.org/transfer-cards · Related mission: aidownunder.org/missions/choose-the-task